cutcharislingbaldy.com
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Publications
  • Books
  • News
  • Media
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Bio
  • Publications
  • Books
  • News
  • Media
  • Contact

Sometimes Writer-Blogger
​Cutcha Risling Baldy​

Dr. Cutcha Risling Baldy Opening Plenary: Give It Back: Publishing and Native Sovereignty at the Association of University Presses Conference OR In Which I Remind Everyone That Andrew Jackson Can Go F Himself

6/15/2020

0 Comments

 
I was honored to be invited along with Dr. Niigaan Sinclair to be a part of the opening Plenary Panel: "Give it Back: Publishing and Native Sovereignty" at the Association of University Presses Conference this year which was supposed to be in Seattle, WA but much like all of 2020 ended up with me in my yoga pants sipping some iced tea out of my Prince mug while answering questions about the future of University publishing. Because we couldn't be there in person we were asked to record our speeches and when they sent me mine I grabbed it and am now uploading it here along with the transcript! 

My guiding principles for writing this speech were (1) let's make this world a better place through revolution, resistance and resurgence; (2) the world is ready for our voices, the voices of Black, Black Indigenous, Indigenous and People of Color. Last week the NY Times Bestseller list was full of books by Black authors. (3) There is always room to tell Andrew Jackson to go F himself. I mean it fits for every speech.

Also, just for the true fans, Audra Simpson recently requested to my friend on Facebook. That's right she gets to see ALLLLL the photos of the puppy and memes about what it's like to be the mom of a teenage girl that are fit to print! I'm trying not to brag too much but here I am bragging.

Video: Dr. Cutcha Risling Baldy Opening Plenary: Give It Back: Publishing and Native Sovereignty (June 15, 2020)

The video may take a moment to load but don't give up! It works for the patient!
This moment of ongoing resistance and revolution that we are experiencing reminds me that the work we have been doing in marginalized communities and the voices of Black, Black Indigenous, Indigenous and People of Color have been and will be the foundation for how we build decolonized futures. 

As we begin today I want to take a moment to say #BlackLivesMatter and encourage us all to work to center and uplift Black lives. We are in a moment of needed solidarity where real change can happen when we build coalitions. Decolonization demands of us to think of our intersectional lives as powerful and full of potential. And we need to remember this will only come from action. 

If you have not yet I highly encourage you to read #BlackInTheIvory

And learn from the stories that are shared by Black Academics about what it is truly like to navigate higher education and academia. ​
It’s very intimidating for me to think about who is potentially on the other end of this zoom meeting today. Editors? Are they real people? Do they also only dress professional from the waist up when they are filming Zoom plenary talks? (Cause I’m wearing pajama pants) 
To this day when I go to academic conferences and I spot someone who’s written a book that has stuck with me in some way I will usually whisper to myself “that’s so and so” and then proceed to silently follow them around so I can see what books they are looking at, who they are talking to, and what they order at coffee shops. Here are some authors I have stalked at Conferences: Audra Simpson; Michelle Jacob, Linda T. Smith, Robert Warrior, one time I literally dived out of the way to avoid Joanne Barker who I had been stalking but she abruptly turned around for some reason so I had to get OUT OF THE WAY. 

These are my Indigenous academic heroes. They showed me what was possible and they helped me to dream. 

One time I saw Jodi Byrd in line at the airport. I instinctively called out “Jodi Byrd!” And she turned around and looked all confused. 

Once I was renting a car and Joy Harjo was in front of me also renting a car and when she turned around I said “Joy Harjo!” And she looked and went “Oh, yeah, that’s me.” 

Then she waited for me to say something and all I could say was “poetry. You’re good at it.” ​
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
The idea of being an author, or becoming an author felt like it would only happen to me if I got very lucky. This was the elite. And me, I was a regular person. 

Sometimes Editors or Assistants would come up to me at Press Booths and say “what are you working on?” And I’d be like “I’m working on getting my life together enough so I’m not sleeping on top of my laundry any more. Although by the way sleeping on top of clean towels can be VERY comfortable.” 

I would never say that I consider myself having enough hubris to be an author, especially an academic author. 

And let’s be honest, the industry itself doesn’t feel set up to help new authors or first generation authors, authors who may be marginalized by editorial decisions and boards. We aren’t mentored through this process, we are expected to take the hits and misses, but we aren’t invited in so much as thrown in. 

At first it also felt like a very dismissive process, having to sell myself and keep people's attention on subjects that really mattered to me. And - to be frank - I noticed a very big difference in how Editors and Staff treated me at conferences before I had a book, after the publication of my book, and then once my book won “Best First Book in Native American and Indigenous Studies.” 

When we start talking about the role that University presses have in shaping what people understand as academic work, or in shaping what is valued as “cutting-edge” research, we must also consider the responsibility that Presses should have toward nurturing our next generation of voices. Those who might not have thought about publishing, those who might think they can never be a part of that elite. Just the perception - the way that the most confident of voices are the ones we hear from the most, or who we invite to speak on subjects, or how we demand certain conventions in the way people present on their work. 

Presses also get reputations and generally those reputations are that they are “dismissive” or “elitist.” Maybe it’s a marketing thing. There were several presses I was considering and was then told by other people “oh you can try them, but they don’t publish Indigenous voices.” And when I looked into them further I noticed, they don’t publish Indigenous voices, they publish the voices of white academics who write about Indigenous peoples. ​
I have been mulling over lately who we Center when we come to these spaces to share our hard fought, often liberatory, but also labor intensive knowledge. I live this work in my body. I read accounts in archives of Indian children hiding in trees and having to remain silent as they listen to the sounds of their family being killed. Those who hid amongst the reeds in rivers and were told not to come out until the river no longer ran red with blood. In 1850 they passed the Act for the Government and Protection of Indians and they started to enslave Native people in California. CA entered the union as a No Slave state - which we are so proud of. But we enslaved Native people. We sold them at courthouses under the guise of “apprenticeship.’ In Humboldt County, a review of these slave records reveals that most persons taken into slavery were children ages 7-12 and most of those were girls. So we should call it what it is - a sex slave industry. They were taking our girls, putting them into homes that didn’t care about them, putting their bodies, their futures up for sale. They were taking them, using them, disposing of them, and it hasn’t stopped. Indigenuos women and girls are still the most likely to be sexually assaulted, murdered, or go missing in the United States. 

I’ve become obsessed with the idea of finding out what would happen if I started mourning loss of land, loss of lives, loss of fish - if my grief was on display. As an academic I’ve internalized the message that somehow the work isn’t supposed to be deeply personal. Like I don’t carry the blood of my ancestors in my veins, blood that has run rivers red as we held on to the bodies of slaughtered children and wailed into the night sky asking ourselves “why” or “what are we supposed to do now?”
 
Like we didn’t sing or dance for all those we lost. Like that song doesn’t come from me now. Like I don’t close my eyes and hug my daughter just a little bit tighter at night because there was a time when they would have ripped her from my arms and sold her. And I would never stop looking for her. I would do anything to find her again. Like my ancestors didn’t search until they couldn’t search any longer. Like we don’t continue to search, or grieve even now.
 
And we live here in this space that they stole from us. This place where we buried our beloved. Where we sing and dance and laugh and love. This place where we cried tears of joy and sadness and from laughing so hard our stomachs hurt and from hurting so hard we thought we’d never laugh again.
 
I can’t wear my grief like that – because it scares people and they go “oh, well she’s emotional” or “oh well, she’s biased” or “oh, she just wants to make white people feel bad about themselves.”

Sometimes this work can start to feel like it is only about our death. Our deaths, not our lives, not our futures, not our present struggles against a settler colonial systems that refuse to imagine our futures as sovereign nations, but instead focus on the violence enacted on our bodies. Making spectacle of our deaths is the practice of genocide. Denial was a practice of history. And we must be careful and mindful not to become merely spectacle again.
We can tell a story about Native peoples that begins and ends with genocide. This has been where many choose to start and stop. But we are not a people born in genocide, we are a people who are born through world renewal. 
There may have been groups of settlers who thought they could stamp out that power, our power, which just shows the hubris of settler colonialism. But it also shows the fear. The fear of our stories. The fear of our continued relationships to land, to fish, to water, to decolonized futures. We are older than settler colonialism, our memories, our epigenetic markers, our DNA knows before settler colonialism and it will know after settler colonialism. It will be here in the next world. For me, our history is not the history of the attempted or ongoing genocide of us. It is a history of survival, resistance, resurgence and re-Indigenization.

This is why my work centers our resurgence, our revitalization. Yes, it is important to understand the many nuances of this attempted genocide, but I also want to talk about us in complex ways that acknowledges we are more than what settlers wrote about us in archives, more than the documentation of our death. 

When we worked in our community to revitalize our women’s coming of age ceremony, we found parts. We heard stories about ancestors who said “I can’t remember everything, but I can remember this. A song. A prayer. A story. I will carry that forward for the next generation.” They planned for us. They knew we would be here. They were not dying, sad, vanishing Indians, they were going to survive and they would remember, so that we could dance and sing and laugh and love.

Yet these are not the stories we read on best seller lists. I don’t want my work or research on genocide to Center our deaths. To make spectacle of this catastrophe. They use words in these books like “labor” instead of “slavery” or “forced prostitution” instead of rape. Like we should believe this story is about a play on words. Defining and redefining us without us. 

See what happens is that there is still an assumption that our peoples histories, stories, research etc. are biased or at the very least “overly emotional.” Sometimes I also get “utopic.” 

I’ll come in to spaces and say “prior to colonization there was no rape. Also everyone had a house and enough food to eat.” 

And then someone will say “she’s biased. And she thinks Indians are the best. And this is a utopic vision of the past.” 

To which reply “Of course I’m biased, so is ---insert white historian here---. And a culture and society with no rape is not a utopia, at least it shouldn’t be, it’s just a good idea.” 

I think now, in this moment we are witnessing, we have seen how the world was shaped by white fragility and white comfort. The books that people centered were written to help maintain a white comfort with how we understand this world. And it was Black and Indigenous feminists, philosophers, and activists who were doing the real work of envisioning worlds without state violence, moving us forward so that we can all breathe. Now it’s time for you all to start thinking “what do we want our futures to look like? What role do we play as university presses in making that world?” 

Take a good, long, look at your list. Where are your Black, Black Indigenous, People of Color voices? What kinds of stories are they telling about us? 

And then do these five things:
1. Stop publishing books about Andrew Jackson. Unless the title of the book is Fuck Andrew Jackson. Then maybe. But ask yourself do we really need another book about Andrew Jackson? (This can also be applied to the following - General Ulysses S. Grant, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, really any dude that signed the Constitution.) 

2. Create Indigenous editorial series with supportive Editors that know Indigenous studies. I published my book with the University of Washington Press because of the Indigenous Confluences Series led by Coll Thrush and Charlotte Cote. 

3. If you’ve already published a book about the California Indian Genocide (but haven’t published a book about California Indian fights for water, salmon, land return, language revitalization or cultural resurgence) then you don’t get to publish any more books about the California Indian Genocide until you do.

4. This is the same for “Indian Wars” or “Early Colonial Relationships.” 

5. And finally, #5: Stop centering white audiences. Think about how you can make books for marginalized communities and audiences. Remember that they also need representation and that their voices have been and will become some of the most needed in times like this- revolution, resistance and resurgence. ​​
In my own community, after my book was published, I would have young people come up to me and say “I bought your book, I’m going to read it.” I would usually respond “well, it sometimes has really big words in it like I have to say epistemology a lot so that it can be an academic book.” 

And this girl, in the 8th grade, said to me “don’t worry, I have a dictionary.” 

In our area, people don’t really hear about us in the news unless we are being reported on for crime - on the 10 most wanted list, drugs, alcohol. This is the story our media usually tells about our tribes in this region. 

“But” this girl said to me “people buy your book. Someone made your book and put it in stores. That means they want to know about Hoopa. They want to know about us.” 

Now, young people have told me they are writing, they are going to write the stories. They said “you have a book, maybe I can have a book.” 

And I say “You can write a book. You can get a book published. I’ll make sure of it.”
0 Comments

In which we discuss the Terra-Gen Wind Energy Project and the Destruction of Sacred Sites or You Can't Mitigate The Destruction of Sacred Sites Deal With It

12/4/2019

0 Comments

 
Y’all, it’s been less than two months (57-58 days), depending on when you skim/read this, since the City of Eureka returned Tuluwat to the Wiyot Tribe. Less than a week (3-4 days) since Native American Heritage Month. Less than 20 minutes since I got an email from someone wanting me to come and speak at their event and teach them about California history and cultural revitalization. Less than thirty seconds since I grabbed a trail mix from my pantry and hunkered down in front of this computer and started reading about all this 

Humboldt Wind, LLC (Terra Gen)

settler

nonsense. 

What the WHAT? 

Look in case you didn’t know (or you don’t live in Humboldt County, or you live in Humboldt County but you don’t get the news or you get the news but you don’t really remember it because lately there is TOO MUCH NEWS) let me sum up: 

Humboldt Wind, LLC (Terra Gen - who in all the documents people are always referring to as “the applicant”) wants to build a 47 wind turbine monstrosity on Tsakiyuit (Bear River Ridge) and Monument Ridge near Rio Dell and Scotia. This is a sacred place for Wiyot peoples and contains several culturally significant resources and archeological sites. The Wiyot Tribe opposes the project because it would destroy these sites and resources. There are other concerns that have been expressed by community members that include “hey, nobody wants to destroy a Wiyot sacred site” and also “we don’t want to kill a bunch of animals or destroy a bunch of plants.” Apparently the location site is “so close to an important bat migration hotspot. Every fall, thousands of hoary bats descend upon Humboldt Redwoods State Park, exhibiting a “swarming” behavior that appears to be unique to this region.” 

Humboldt Wind, LLC/Terra Gen (“the applicant”) believes that “The Project’s benefits outweigh the significant unavoidable impacts” because the wind farm will be “sufficient to power 70,000 households” and “would displace emissions of approximately 384,068 metric tons per year of carbon dioxide.” Also there’s gonna be a lot of money saved (through local grid improvements) and a lot of tax revenue (for over 30 years) and science. 

No really, I read the appeal letter. It basically ends with a paragraph that’s like “and science! Science, science, hoary bats, science. This is science. Science is science and science. Do it for SCIENCE.”

I’m going to post here the entirety of “the applicants” “Benefits to Knowledge Base.” explanation that was included in the appeal:

​
The formation and operation of a Technical Advisory Committee would allow the scientific community to study specific populations of bats known to occur in the region, including the hoary bat, and understand population trends in general, as well as the impacts of the Project on the population. A similar level of scientific knowledge would be provided for avian species. This will contribute to the greater scientific knowledge base and support future environmental analyses and mitigations.
This is basically saying “everytime one of these goddamn Hoary bats flies in to one of these things and dies they will let the scientists study it and then we can learn more. Same for all the dead birds! YOU’RE WELCOME SCIENCE.” 

Look, the Wiyot Tribe (as well as several environmental groups, community organizations and other community members, oh and the city of Rio Dell) oppose this project. So I feel like that’s it right? We’re done here. Cool. We’ll go find a better project. 

Except. Nah. 

Now “the applicant” is appealing to the Board of Supervisors of Humboldt County to approve the project even though the Planning Commission voted to not approve the project. 

Which brings us here. 

My open letter to the Board of Supervisors about the proposed wind turbine project on Tsakiyuit (Bear River Ridge) and Monument Ridge near Rio Dell and Scotia. ​

Dear Board of Supervisors: 

What the WHAT? Is this where we are, really? I’m supposed to come before you and so humbly explain why building a giant frigging wind farm in the middle of a sacred site for Wiyot people is a bad idea? Why it’s spitting in the face of relationships with Indigenous peoples in Humboldt County? Why it’s outdated and short sighted and also why it basically is a giant fuck you to everyone in this county who is doing the hard work of actual reconciliation and collaboration with tribes? Also have you read this appeal letter, it’s bananas. It’s a joke. I look forward to staged dramatic readings of it with Patrick Stewart in his best Hamlet’s Ghost Dad voice. 
ATTENTION PEASANTS! Humboldt Wind, LLC hereby appeals the November 21, 2019 decision of the Planning Commission of the County of Humboldt to deny its application for a Conditional Use Permit and Special Permit for a wind energy project (the “project). TO BE OR NOT TO BE!
Lately, when I try to use my oh so measured approach with people, reasonable people, about why we can’t (shant?) build a giant wind turbine installation on a sacred site inevitably they look at me and they go “Cutcha do you just want us all to die?! We are in a climate crisis! We have to do something! WIND OR DIE!” 

I get it. We are in a crisis. There’s not enough rain, the fish are endangered, the dams are failing, and we’re starting to see massive storms, erosion, an increase in temperature, oh and the whole thing is on fire. This dumpster fire is a literal fire. 

So yes, we are in a crisis. And the writing is on the wall. All that stuff that settlers did when they came rushing in to California had lasting consequences for future generations (that’s us, we are the future generations). They blew up mountains and pushed tons of dirt into the rivers and willy nilly cut off streams because they wanted gold. They HAD to have it. It was gold or die! Everybody needed the gold. Capitalism! Money! It was good for the county! If everyone was making money then they’d pay more taxes! Imagine their appeal letter: Sorry we blew up that mountain, we understand there are “significant unavoidable impacts” on the environment and people but you know… it’s just tribes.

At some point, there was also some guy who went you know what’d be dope. Pouring a bunch of mercury into the water so we can get at flecks of gold. Chisa Oros writes in her amaze-balls thesis that: 
sediment gathered was treated with methylmercury, also called mercury or quicksilver, in order to gather the gold bits and separate the lucrative product from other minerals the miners did not have interest in. The mercury, a highly toxic metal, was washed away or discarded on the banks of rivers or outside the mines in large pits (10).
So yeah, miners and mining companies at one point had to realize “oh, we’ve poisoned the water and fish. That sucks, those are some “significant unavoidable impacts” that we will mitigate later.” (As far as I know they didn’t go “but now you can study all the dead fish! And we’ve created an opportunity for ongoing studies of the impact of mercury in water to the fish for the next 10,000 years! You’re welcome science!) 

Eventually there was company (applicant?) who went “we should cut down all the trees! WEEEEEE. Oops, now all the soil is eroding and everything sucks, also oxygen. Unavoidable impacts are tough.” 

Then came the companies who were all “you know what would be a good idea, building a bunch of giant dams to make electricity” and then all the fish started dying and everyone was like “oops, sorry, that actually does affect the ecosystem and stuff. Who knew that long term having these dams would cause so much damage that we would be endangering species in the river and the ocean. Orcas are starving because salmon are dying. The water is warming. But we have electricity! Also now you can study the starving Orcas more closely because they can’t swim away because they are starving. You’re welcome science!”

This problem is not a new problem, it is a settler colonialism problem, it is a problem where we continue to repeat the same tired arguments (“it’s better for the economy” “we need energy now” “it’s just ONE sacred site” “I mean it’s just Indians…”) and then expect different results. 


You’re not going to save the world by denying the sacredness of her. 

We are in a crisis. A crisis that was made, founded, built, and upheld by settler colonial arrogance, greed, and willful ignorance. You don’t get to have that excuse any more. Not when despite hundreds of years of attempted destruction of our ways of life, of massacres and murders, of assimilation, removal, and termination, we are still here. We will still come to your meetings and stand in front of your boards and say to you “This is sacred. We know this to be true. We are telling you this is not the way.” And we carry on our sacred relationship to these lands and we are still willing and able to protect and fight for the relationship because we know, we absolutely know, that we will not solve this problem through “mitigation” and “unavoidable impacts” we will solve it with relationship, reciprocity and respect. 
Know this: Indigenous peoples are 4% of the world’s population, live on 22% of the earth’s surface -- an on that land is 80% of the planets remaining biodiversity. (Sacred Land Trust)

Know this: Research shows that granting indigenous groups formal rights to their lands is one of the most effective ways to support communities and conserve the forest. (Los Angeles Times)
Our knowledge of place is thousands of years old. Our ability to manage in a way that centers land, life, and futures is what will solve this problem. We are not coming to the table just to be heard, we are coming to the table because we know something has to be done. We’ve been doing it. We’ve been doing it despite all the ways that law, policy, the state, the federal government, and companies have tried to keep us from building, re-building and centering this relationship. Now that it’s becoming obvious how important Indigenous scientific environmental knowledges are, it’s your turn Humboldt County, it’s your turn to sit back, listen, and build something better, something that is actually going to solve this crisis.  

Our sacred sites are not designated lightly. The power of these parts of the earth, the movement and monument that are these places, this thousands of years of knowledge and relationship is not built, maintained, or severed lightly. This is not an easy thing to do, to build a sacred relationship. And I would say that the Wiyot saying no to this project is also not done lightly. It is not done with flippancy. It is not done with malice. 

This is about reverence. A reverence that reverberates through time. A revereance that exists to this day despite genocide, removal, relocation, and termination. Continuing to participate in the ongoing attempts to sever this relationship between Wiyot peoples and their sacred places is the continued willful ignorance, it is carrying on a legacy of genocide, a legacy of destruction.

As we sit in our big fancy chairs and read the reports, listen to the testimonies, move through the appeal letter (try not to laugh at the part where they are like “there’s gonna be SO MUCH SUB DIVIDING IF YOU DON’T DO THIS YA HEAR ME! SUB DIVIDING!”) we need to remember that we are at a precipice of history and the future, standing somewhere in between, where we can either build something meaningful and new or repeat and uphold a system that caused this problem in the first place. 

We are in a crisis. This crisis will continue if we cannot re-build our relationship to these lands, these more-than-human relatives, these fish, flora and fauna, in real ways. 

It's just a no.

We have to find a better project. 

If you’d like to come and show support for the Wiyot there is an upcoming important public meeting with the Board of Supervisors on December 16 beginning at 9 a.m. at the Adorni Center. As I’ve been told by people smarter than me: “People gotta show up. They gotta speak and use their two minutes.” 
Picture
More articles if you want to read more about the issue: 

https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2019/may/16/op-ed-wiyot-tribe-urges-people-cast-wary-eye-ridge/
 
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2019/nov/7/op-ed-terra-gen-wind-power-project-will-chain-us-c/
 
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2019/nov/13/city-rio-dell-opposes-humboldt-wind-energy-project/
 
https://www.northcoastjournal.com/humboldt/protect-tsakiyuwit-deny-terra-gens-wind-farm/Content?oid=15732520
 
Also here is a link to the Humboldt Wind site that contains the Draft and Final EIR.
 
https://humboldtgov.org/2408/Humboldt-Wind-Energy-Project


0 Comments

Why the F’in F Are They Building A Dollar General In Mckinleyville or In Which We Discuss the corrupt and frankly dangerous practices of the Dollar General company

9/13/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture
The sign went up this week “Coming Soon- Dollar General!” Well, wait – the fence went up first. They put a big fence around this empty lot almost as if to say “we must protect the Dollar General.”

It’s not a very tall fence.


I guess I need to start with – I am against Dollar General being built in Mckinleyville (the town where I live) right across the street from the local high school (where a number of Native students go to school) and on a corner that is very near a number of neighborhoods and other schools.

Not just because it’s not a very bright vision of the future we might want for our community. It’s not open green space, a public garden, a skate park, an artist installation and gathering place – it’s a freaking Dollar General. But also because Dollar General is a company that spent the better part of the past few years single handedly trying to challenge Native tribal sovereignty and prevent us from being able to civilly prosecute non-Native offenders for sexually assaulting our children.
​
That’s right, they spent the better part of the past few years spending all kinds of money to protect a child abuser. They decided it was much more important to take away Native tribes ability to protect their children (through civil court) than to pay restitution to a Native child who experienced multiple instances of sexual assault from a Dollar General Manager.

​Fuck Dollar General.

To explain this I’ll need to go all the way back in the 1800s. That’s right – it’s time for a quick down and dirty Federal Indian law lesson. It will bring us all the way back to the present and me standing on the corner of the street I grew up on wondering HOW our County Supervisors allowed for a corporation like this to get it’s grubby little hands on land that is across the street from our high school kids. And why they didn’t even THINK that what Dollar General had done was egregious enough to make sure they were not allowed in our community. Native people (Native women, Native kids) are treated as sacrificial, we are not enough of a concern to warrant a quick google search and a “oh, maybe we don’t want corporations here that protect child abusers and treat Native tribes like they are savage.”
​
*Note. This is not a comprehensive look at Federal Indian Law that goes through all of the convoluted steps that have been taken to chip away at Native tribal sovereignty and our ability to protect our Native peoples from violence and assault. Also I’m not a lawyer. I’ve never claimed to be a lawyer. I once thought about being a lawyer and then I worked as an assistant for a bunch of lawyers who all took me out to lunch one day and said “NEVER NEVER BE A LAWYER. EVER.” Lawyers are hilarious.*

Picture
Picture

Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (2016)

It was 2003
 …a 13-year-old Choctaw boy went to work at a Dollar General store on the reservation as a part of his tribe’s Youth Opportunity Program, where an employer gets free labor in exchange for giving Choctaw youths work experience.
​
What started as a well-intended partnership became a nightmare. The store’s manager, Dale Townsend, was accused of molesting the boy during store hours.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office, which has to handle criminal cases for Tribes (especially, in this case, because it was a non-Native offender) declined to prosecute the case (this tends to happen a lot. Most of the time they decline to prosecute. “It’s expensive.” “It’s just one case…” etc. etc.)

Native tribes cannot prosecute non-Native offenders who commit violent crimes (like sexual assault) against Native people on Native lands. Just let that sit for a moment.

We cannot prosecute people who come to our lands and assault our people. The case was left with a “too bad, so sad.”
So the boy’s family tried to seek justice through tribal court asking for a civil judgement against the manager and Dollar General. Dollar General refused and they sued saying they didn’t wanna go before the tribal court because the tribal court will be mean to them because tribal peoples will just be mean to non-native peoples wah! (I paraphrase)

Here are some things to keep in mind:
  1. Dollar General signed a lease with the tribe and obtained a business license through the tribe in the year 2000. They agreed in that lease that they would go to tribal court.
  2. The boy was working as part of a joint tribal-Dollar General internship program.
  3. Tribes have the right (according to Montana v. United States) to hear civil cases over non-Indians on tribal land when non-Indians enter into a voluntary relationship with the tribe.
  4. Nobody forced Dollar General to sign the lease –they did so knowing full well that it meant they would be going to tribal court for civil issues.
    ​
Dollar General took the case all the way to the Supreme Court. Rather than go to tribal court and agree to pay restitution to this child they spent however large amounts of money to take this case before the Supreme Court hoping that the Supreme Court would take away the ability for Native peoples to attempt to get any sort of justice when non-Native offenders assault Native peoples on Native land. 

But How Did We Get Here?

Wait a minute. A non-Native person can commit a crime against a Native person on Native land and not answer for it? They can get away with it? How is that? What? Is? That?

Yup.

And it happens a lot (both the committing of violence and the getting away with it).

See all the way back in 1883 a man by the name of Crow Dog came before the Supreme Court in a case called Ex Parte Crow Dog. Crow Dog killed another Native man named Spotted Tail. The tribal council decided that Crow Dog, in line with his tribal traditions, would pay restitution to Spotted Tail’s family. However, the U.S. said that was wrong and that the tribe SHOULD have hung Crow Dog. (Interesting that what they really wanted was two dead Indians and not just one). Crow Dog was found guilty in U.S. court and was sentenced to hang. He decided to take his case all the way to the Supreme Court where the Supreme Court at the time said “nope. You can’t hang him. Tribes are the ones who have jurisdiction over these crimes on their land. They are frigging sovereign nations.”

At the same time though the court was like “But, if Congress wanted to pass a law that said Indians no longer could be in charge of this kind of stuff Congress could do that because Congress has plenary power over Native tribes so…”
Guess what happened two years later? The Major Crimes Act (1885).

This is where Congress was like “Indian tribes are so savage and they don’t know that you’re supposed to hang people for everything. So we are going to pass a law that says Native American Tribes CANNOT prosecute crimes that are major.” Indian tribes could no longer prosecute any cases that involved: murder, manslaughter, rape, assault with intent to kill, arson, burglary and larceny. Later they updated this list to include: kidnapping, maiming, sexual abuse, incest, assault against a minor, felony child abuse or neglect and robbery.

Who is supposed to try these “major crimes” when they are committed against Native people on Native land?  The U.S. Attorney’s Office (someone is gonna want me to get into Public Law 280 and how messed up that is but I don’t have time for that so just know that there are some states where it is not the U.S. Attorney but rather local governments that are supposed to prosecute major crimes).

Often the U.S. Attorney’s office will decline to prosecute major crimes that are committed against Native people. There are many documented statistics about the fact that cases are often declined, never investigated or “lost” to the system that asks outside agencies to come in and prosecute Individual cases on rural reservations.
​Finding numbers about the total amount of cases that are “declined” by federal prosecutors is difficult. NPRs ongoing work about how this specifically affects the prosecution of rape cases against Native women demonstrates that this is an ongoing problem: 
If cases are declined, Richter said, it's because many rapes are inherently difficult to try, and federal courts place a high burden on prosecutors for evidence.

"We have to live in the real world," he explained. "Just because a case is not brought, doesn't mean we don't wish a case could be brought."
​
But federal law-enforcement officials who spoke to NPR believe that U.S. attorneys find the sexual assault cases insignificant compared to their usual work — terrorism, organized crime, drugs, racketeering.
​So Native tribes cannot prosecute. U.S. agencies decline to prosecute. And the offender can go about their business after having assaulted and violated a Native person. It’s a legal loophole that has existed since 1885. And people know it’s a problem. They KNOW there are statistics to support it. Yet, we still get cases like Dollar General where they come in and want to take away our rights to find justice through civil cases. 

Why do they hate Tribal Courts so much

In 1978 the Supreme Court issued a decision in a case called Oliphant v Suquamish. This dude Mark David Oliphant was a non-Indian living on Suquamish Tribal land. And then he assaulted a police officer and resisted arrest. The county and the BIA didn’t send anyone to arrest him so he was arrested by tribal officers. Oliphant took it all the way to the Supreme Court saying that he couldn’t be arrested by Indians because he didn’t WANNA BE! And the Supreme Court went “yep, you’re right. Tribes can’t arrest or prosecute non-Native offenders when they commit crimes on their land.”

This means if you are a non-native who commits a crime on Indian land a tribal police officer can’t arrest you and a tribal court can’t prosecute you so basically, cool, just go ahead and be a dick cause ain’t nobody gonna do nothing about it.
​
The idea from the Supreme Court was that Indian tribes are not real sovereigns (domestic-dependent) and also even if they are you shouldn’t have to be subjected to another sovereigns “customs and procedures.” And then- get this, the Supreme Court is like (not a direct quote but you’ll get the gist) “you know, like Crow Dog. We said that if you’re an Indian you shouldn’t have to be subjected to another sovereign’s customs and procedures so it’s the same for non-Indians too!”
​
EXCEPT THEY ALREADY DID. MAJOR CRIMES ACT ANYBODY?

Also – tell that to France. You can go visit and go up the Eifel Tower and then pee down the front of it and when they come to arrest you be like “Look, I’m from the U.S. And we should haven’t to be subjected to your customs and procedures!” See how that works.

At the end of the Oliphant decision the court “invited” Congress to fix this problem acknowledging that there was a very high crime rate against Native people and that this would likely create a further issue. But Congress was like “meh… it happens.” 

They must have done something by now right?

Kinda.

Montana v. United States (1981) said that tribes can exercise civil jurisdiction over nonmembers if:
(1) the nonmembers have entered "consensual relationships with the tribe or its members, through commercial dealing, contracts, leases, or other arrangements" or (2) the nonmember's "conduct threatens or has some direct effect on the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the tribe."

This means that tribes can at the very least oversee matters of restitution through civil court. If there is no other justice we can hope for, there is AT LEAST that.

In 2010 the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act included provisions to extend the ability of Native tribes to arrest and prosecute non-Native offenders. In 2010 Obama also passed the Tribal Law and Order Act which expands the abilities of tribal courts to prosecute violent offenders but limits sentencing: not greater than 3 years, fines are limited to $15,000, and jurisdiction is limited in scope.
​
There are new cases of tribes who have been able to establish the capacity to prosecute violent crimes (under this limited scope) but this has just begun. Some legal experts are saying that it is likely these cases will end up in the Supreme Court again – to test the strength of the Tribal Law and Order Act. 

So What about Dollar General?

What I’m always telling people when I go do talks about these ongoing issues of legal loopholes to commit violence against our people is that these cases matter not just because of the precedent they set, not just because of the statistics but also because we are people. And any person who is assaulted and violated should have justice. Because they matter. This Choctaw boy, every child, every person faced with the long lasting trauma of these crimes – they need to know that we value them – that we will fight for them and that we will not allow a company like Dollar General to have the last say in what justice looks like.

The Humboldt County Board of Supervisors and Planning Department that approved Dollar General being built in our community, a community with 12 local area tribes, a community that has a significant number of tribal peoples living in it, a community that supposedly values our tribal peoples knowledge and voices – should be ashamed of themselves. They should be ashamed that they supported and approved of a company who made it their goal to attack Native sovereignty and to devalue a 13-year old boy who had to spend YEARS after his assaults testifying and worrying about the outcome of this case.

We are people. Our children are at risk. Our people experience some of the highest rates of violence. Our communities are part of your community – Humboldt County. And you are willing to ignore that this corporation, one that would rather protect their business and money interests than actually work as part of a community to protect children, is coming in to our community.

It is telling that once again our children are the ones who are sacrificed in the name of cheap and easy shopping for cheap and easy food (or sponges or toys etc).

The outcome of the Dollar General case is that they lost. They frigging lost. But they only lost because Scalia died. The decision came back 4-4 and Scalia’s history had always been to vote against Native tribal sovereignty. Because the decision was tied the lower court ruling was upheld and that ruling said that tribes should be able to civilly prosecute non-Native offenders (when they agree to be prosecuted by the tribe in their lease and contracts).

Dollar General spent all that money and all that time to denigrate Native tribal sovereignty, to imply that we would be unfair, to imply that we were primitive, savage and that “all Native juries” or a “Native judge” would somehow be unable to serve. Yet, as pointed out by Justice Sotamayor, they wouldn’t say the same thing about an all-white jury or a white judge.  Dollar General spent all that time and money to keep a Native boy from seeking justice.

That’s who Dollar General is.

That’s what they bring into communities.

That’s what is being ignored when they are allowed to put up their “coming soon” sign.

Fuck Dollar General. 

I care and I don't want Dollar General!

What do we do now? We are working on it. Hoping that people will step up and start to make a big stink about this. Some people say to me "But they're already building, they are already breaking ground so... too late." 

Nah - it's not. 

So let's make it obvious that we are actually a community and we want our community to be better than frigging Dollar General. 

First - SHARE THIS BLOG! Let everyone know about Dollar General and their practices.

1. You can message  District 5 County Supervisor Ryan Sundberg. 
​
Contact info: Ryan Sundberg (5th District)
825 5th Street, Room 111
Eureka, CA 95501
Direct line: (707) 476-2395
rsundberg@co.humboldt.ca.us


2. You can message soon to be District 5 Supervisor Steve Madrone and tell him that he needs to be out there stopping Dollar General. Try the Facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/madrone4supervisor/

3. You can write a letter to the North Coast Journal or the Times Standard, 

4. You can show up outside of where they are building the Dollar General with a sign that says "NO DOLLAR GENERAL." 

5. You can go to the next County Supervisors Meeting. September 25, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. ​humboldtgov.org/Calendar.aspx?EID=3750

6. If you are a member of a tribe (especially local tribes) you can encourage your Tribal Chairs and Tribal Council to write letters to the supervisors, come to the supervisors meeting and generally make a big old stink about all of this. 

7. You can comment on this post and I will post them and put them on posters and send them to the Supervisors myself.

I am so fortunate to be surrounding by some powerful Native people. We have been talking about this. We will be looking at what we need to do next. I thank them for reaching out to me and inspiring me to begin here. #NoDollarGeneralMckinleyville

​Will add more soon.



0 Comments

Don't Be Afraid to Sing Out or How I Became a Singer or My Book Is Coming Out In Two Months

3/8/2018

0 Comments

 
I realize it has been a good long while since I've sat down and written a blog entry but it is for good reason. And that reason is I haven't felt like it. No but really. I've been doing all the things you all should have been doing over the past few months: I went and saw Black Panther. I bought Heart Berries by Terese Mailhot. Went to some symposiums. Presented at some conferences. Oh, and I've finalized everything for the book which is coming out in JUST A FEW MONTHS (as in two months. TWO MONTHS). 

I've learned a lot along the way. Because being an Indian is lived research and critical thinking. Our traditions teach us to be thinkers by showing us that there are no easy answers and that through sustained exploration we can continually learn and sometimes change our findings, based on our lived experiences, on our relationality to the world around us, on our dreams, on our families, on ourselves. This is part of the reason why the static nature of research feels so counter intuitive. All the so-called objectivity and positivism, all the times we have been told that our feelings weren’t the same as the statistics. All the times that we have been confronted with these statistics as if they are more important than our voices and our stories.

And now, as we continue to build Native studies, decolonization theory and praxis, Native feminisms, and Indigenous futurisms, we are able to build approaches to education that value survivance, sovereignty and story. In the contemporary context, stories have the power to (re)claim sovereignty, landscapes, cultures and knowledge. 

And what is research, what is education, but exploring the world through stories?

So this is a story... about how I became a singer. 
Picture
Picture
I didn’t know growing up that every time my Grandmother would interrupt me while I was trying to watch TV after school that she was teaching me. Most of her stories didn’t have endings and she would often start in the middle of a thought. The things I remember from my very young childhood that she taught me were (1) don’t act like a white girl. White girls are spoiled and they don’t respect their parents. And they won’t get dirty. (2) If someone comes at you like they think they are hot shit, go get your cousin. That’s what cousins are for. (3) You will eat water fried potatoes and soggy bacon and you will like it. Also, malt-o-meal is a MEAL. It has the word right in there.

As I got older she taught me much more like – wear shoes that actually fit you. If you can’t climb up the mountain, crawl up the mountain. And never let a man hit you. And if he hits you, you leave and you never look back. 

She died of kidney failure when I was at Stanford. Diabetes. She told me once that dying of kidney failure because of diabetes was a very Indian thing of her to do and that she hoped I would put that in my book some day.

Before, when she was sick, my Mom made me go to the hospital to sit with her and talk about her life. I said “Grandma, mom wants me to ask you questions about your life.” And she said “Because I’m dying? That sounds like a fun way to spend a Saturday.”

There was a lot she told me – more education – more stories. One thing she said “do you know why it’s important to sing? You had a pretty voice growing up, but now you don’t sing. Not in ceremony, not in public, not in front of people. Girls are taught this now, they don’t sing out. Back in my day, girls, they would sing out. I taught my girls to sing out. All Hupa girls used to sing out. We could shake mountains. And the men would just dance away to our songs. But now so many of you girls are taught to fade into the background. And you try to. So you don’t sing. Because you think that’s what girls are, background.” And she ended with, “don’t be afraid to sing out.” 

Many years later I was living in San Diego and I was in an abusive relationship. All those strong women in my life, all those stories, all that Indian education, and there I was pinned up against a wall with his finger in my face telling me that I was worthless. He said, “Cutcha, nobody else will ever want you.” He said, “Cutcha, nobody else will ever love you.” And one night after a particularly violent incident I was on the floor of our bathroom. I didn’t know how I was going to get off the bathroom floor. I didn’t know how I was going to leave. But I knew a song. And I heard my grandmother say to me, from somewhere far away (we say across the river) “don’t be afraid to sing out.” So I sang to myself, and I got up. 

Months later I would finally attend our revitalized women's coming-of-age ceremony, as a dancer. I hadn't planned on singing. My Auntie pulled me aside and said "I'm going to teach you a song. It's your Great Grandfather's song. It's pretty easy. When the time comes I'm going to call you out and tell you to sing it." 

"But I don't..." 

​"You'll start. We will join in." 

I stood at the top of the house that night and tried to hide in the shadows. The time came. Auntie said "Cutcha's going to sing." 

​And so I began...


Page from the book!

Picture

As I have readied for the release of the book I have been going through many files, photos and other things I've collected along the way. This includes a set of songs which were recorded by me with my cousin Viola "Chummy" Brooks and my (at the time) 6 year old daughter (who is now 10). 

Along with these recordings I have been reviewing the recordings that were collected in the 1970s as people were trying to document this dance that our communities had not been doing publicly for quite some time. 

​There are even recordings of elders who were working with ethnographers in the earlier/mid 1900s where they expressed hope that one day someone would sing their song again. 


It is amazing to think about these recordings as moments in time where elders shared the songs they could remember, songs that had been passed down through their families, songs they recorded in the hopes that one day people would sing them again. And now we do. We not only sing those songs, we sing our own songs, songs that have come to us and stayed with us. Songs that remind us to laugh, to pray, to love and to sing out. 

Going through these recordings I am struck by the way they all document a moment in time. Like how my own little girl is singing her Grandmother's song. One that she has heard over and over again at the Flower Dances we go to. In her life, we have always done this women's ceremony. This is who we are as Hupa people. We dance and sing and celebrate young women. This is who we have always been and who we will always be. And her Grandmother's song will be carried with her always. And women always sing out. 

"Say something." I say on the recording. "Say testing, testing." 
"Testing, testing," she responds. 
"Now sing Grandma's song." 
And she begins.

Some other songs. The first is my very first song that came to me while I was making mashed potatoes. It's my mashed potatoes song. The second is my cousin Viola's song - it means "grow old in a good way."

0 Comments

People Magazine is trying to tell me that Blake Shelton is the Sexiest Man Alive OR If Taika Waititi isn't the sexiest man alive this year then what is even the point of any of this - life, breathing... any of it?

11/15/2017

0 Comments

 
People Magazine and The Voice made some kind of deal with the Devil where the Devil was like "hey, you will convince the world that The Voice coaches are the sexiest men alive." Because that's two out of two current Voice coaches who were named sexiest men alive (and none of them are Pharrell). 

Exhibit A: 2013
Picture
Exhibit B: Today. 2017. 
Picture
People Magazine is trying to convince me that these two dudes from The Voice are the sexiest men alive. But this is not a blog to drag People Magazine and their (often very white) list of sexiest men alive. Even though... Exhibit C:
Picture
This is not even a blog entry to throw side eye at Blake Shelton who has a history of racism and homophobia (unapologetic racism and homophobia). This is not even a blog entry where I'm just going to write: BUT BUT  IDRIS ELBA... over and over again until my hand cramps. 
There are several think pieces about "men of color who could also be sexiest man alive" because... apparently People Magazine still hasn't gotten the memo. So I'm not going to do that either. I'm just going to use this blog entry as a way to say "I don't depend on People Magazine to tell me who the sexiest men alive are because People Magazine don't know." And also "hey guess what it's high time we had some Indigenous men appreciation because we were here first, so we've been sexiest men-ing alive this place since year 1." 

So here is my list of "Five Indigenous Sexiest Men Alive" that may not be on the cover of People Magazine but  are quite rightly on the cover of this blog. 
Picture
Obvious answer is obvious. If Taika Waititi (Maori) isn't the sexiest man alive this year then what is even the point of any of this - life, breathing... any of it? This year Waititi did many sexy things - like he made Thor relevant, and he actually made me go to the movies with my family and not once wish that I had stayed home to watch something on Netflix. He's a director, an actor, and basically if you don't know who he is by now you best watch  this, this and this and then COME CORRECT. #GIVEHIMTHECOVEROFALLMAGAZINES
Picture
Other obvious answer is obvious. I'm just going to leave this here. And then I'm going to say "Jason Mamoa is a living, breathing man walking this earth." And he's got a movie to promote. And he's alive. So when we're talking "Sexiest Man ALIVE" ahem. #NowTryNotToSpendTheNextTwentyMinutesGooglingPicsOfJasonMamoa 
Picture
No seriously SHUT THE FRONT DOOR People Magazine. Like GET OUT. Don't even come at me right now. This is Michael Greyeyes (Plains Cree from the Muskeg Lake First Nation in Saskatchewan) and he's on Fear The Walking Dead right now and basically I CANNOT NOT WITH YOU ANY MORE. 
Picture
 I'm very happy that I can legit spend an hour of my day googling images of sexy Native men for your viewing pleasure. But it's also starting to make me very, very angry. I mean COME ON. Martin Sensmeier (Tlingit, Koyukon-Athabascan) is straight up legit a real live person and guess what - he also has a movie to promote. A possible OSCAR CONTENDING movie. AND GUESS WHAT this is him just hanging out in a gray t-shirt. I swear People Magazine wants to fight. They are like "come at me. Look it's Blake Shelton!" #NahImGood
Picture
True story about Jemaine Clement (Maori). He was filming a movie in our small town just this past year. And my BFF texts me and says "I just saw the best looking dude I have ever seen in our town walking down the street. I kind of wanted to stop him and say 'how did you get here? What are you doing here? It was like seeing a unicorn in real life. He did not leave a trail of glitter or rainbows behind him, but I'm sure he could have." Later I told her about Jemaine being in town and she was like "that was him! That's the unicorn!" That's right. He's a damn Unicorn. #IndigenousHipsterUnicorn
I could do this all day. Don't get me started on the amazing Native activists who are protecting our environment for future generations. Or even some of the super awesome Indigenous academics  who are disrupting settler colonialism. That would be a fun list. "Allow me to objectify a bunch of Indigenous men academics, all in the name of shaming People Magazine of course (of course)." With my luck it would go all kinds of viral and then suddenly I'm expected to include it in my tenure file. 

Point? That point is that People Magazine just farted this issue out didn't they? They just went to work and were all "okay, let's see, we haven't done a coach on The Voice in like a few years. Let's go with that." 

​And if Taika Waititi isn't the sexiest man alive this year THEN WHAT IS EVEN LIFE? 
0 Comments

An Indigenous People's Day Poem

10/9/2017

0 Comments

 
​Why do you teach Native Studies?
Resistance. Decolonization. 
Why do you teach the young ones to sing? 
Resistance. Decolonization. 
Why do you wear Native jewelry? 
Resistance. Decolonization. 
Why? 
Resistance. Decolonization.


-Cutcha Risling Baldy (Hupa, Karuk, Yurok) 

​#Happy Indigenous PeoplesDay
0 Comments

This Week in #SettlerNonsense - right in my backyard! On the Return of Tuluwat (Indian Island) to the Wiyot

8/2/2017

5 Comments

 
PicturePhoto from Wiyot Tribal Website
Let me start here. Just the other day I was on Facebook when I came across a post from the Wiyot Tribe where they tagged my friend Rachel Sundberg and thanked her for helping them learn more about cultural protocols, dance regalia and continuing ceremonial practices. The Wiyot children in the photos were happy and strong and in one photo a young girl was wearing a dress that I recognized, a dress that was worn by Wiyot tribal member Michelle Hernandez in 2014 when the Wiyot did their first women’s coming-of-age ceremony in over 100 years.

I have to start here. I have to. Because most people would start on February 26, 1860 when Humboldt County citizens massacred more than 150 Wiyot people who had just finished their World Renewal Ceremony to pray for the health and well-being of the community and the world. Humboldt County citizens came with hatchets and knives - what one scholar,
Tony Platt, refers to as “quiet weapons.” They murdered mostly Indian women and children. And that was the last time the Wiyot performed a World Renewal Ceremony on Tuluwat (what became known as “Indian Island”).


I don’t want to start there. Because the Wiyot are so much more than the massacring of their people. They not only have survived, they have thrived and they continue to restore and revitalize. In 2014 they brought back their women’s coming-of-age ceremony and then they also revitalized their World Renewal Ceremony, on Tuluwat.
​

The City of Eureka has been working with the Wiyot for the return of Indian Island for a few years now. The Wiyot Tribe purchased some of the island in 2000 which included an ancestral village.

In 2000, after years of fundraising, the tribe purchased an acre and a half of the historic Tuluwat site from the City of Eureka, and six years later the city voluntarily returned an additional 60 acres to the tribe. https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2015/apr/4/eureka-consider-giving-rest-indian-island-back-wiy/ ​
In 2015 the Eureka City Council voted to give the island back to the tribe - in toto.
​

On Monday, local (businessman?) Rob Arkley went on the KINS Radio TalkShop to talk about his opinions on the return of Tuluwat to the Wiyot. ​
They want to give away Indian Island to the In- to the Wiyots. Well I use Indian Island. I like it. My kids do. I see people there all the time when I’m over there. I don’t get how they can take one of our assets and give it. So I’m going to be offering over the appraised value for the property and if I get it, giving it away as surplus property, well that’s fine, but at the same time that’s an asset that’s gone from the public forever the Wiyots have made no commitment for us to use it and the city is giving it away! What is this city thinking of? I mean, it’s astonishing and flabbergasting to me. https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2017/jul/31/rob-arkley-wants-buy-indian-island-prevent-eureka/ ​
A day later he (and his wife) tried to clarify what they meant when he said “What is this city thinking of?” etc. So they made a statement which went like this:
Rob’s conversation on Talk Shop [yesterday] morning was completely misconstrued by Lost Coast Outpost in the article they posted [Monday]. We believe in this community and have proven it time and time again with our contributions over the years. Now we have offered to purchase Indian Island, but we do not want to own it. We would rather preserve it for the entire community.
We recognize that the massacre that took place in 1860 was horrific. It is not our wish to deny the Wiyot tribe access to sacred ceremonial grounds, or to their heritage, but to preserve the rights to the island for all citizens. It is a property with great historical significance and it belongs to all of us.
Why can’t we come up with a solution to share the island, learn from each other and benefit from our differing cultures for generations to come?
                   Sincerely,
                   Cherie and Rob Arkley
https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2017/aug/1/arkleys-clarify-indian-island-intentions-say-they/ ​
PictureOr you can read this book...
Look, we can go over and over the history of genocide in Humboldt County, the “deranged frontier” (as Jack Norton says), the indiscriminate murder of Native people that founded this place, details like “Indian hunting days” and killing babies by stomping on their heads or cutting out their hearts. We can talk about how Native peoples were called “savage” while murderers were called “settlers.” We can go over the statistics like the $1 million dollars paid for the hunting and killing of Indians in the State of California, with some prices set at $5 per head and 25 cents per scalp. Or even stories about people riding their horses down the center of town with Indian heads dragged behind them so they could trade them in for money.

We can talk about the day that I was in the archive and came across a picture of Humboldt County “legend”
Seth Kinman who is described as a “hunter and early settler of the Humboldt County region” when in fact he was murdering psycho-path who liked to pose in photos with Indian scalps. We could look at the Indian slave records in Humboldt County and talk about Native people who were sold into slavery in Old Town Eureka and how records show most of these were children.

We can talk about the indiscriminate sexual assault of Native women and children that happened during this founding of Humboldt County, how there were reports of Indian women being assaulted as their families had to watch in horror, afraid that if they tried to fight back their daughters would be killed. We can call into question why the names of roads in our towns are the names of men who “settled” this place when settlement was not benign, it was depraved. We can reiterate that there are some settler families who benefited from this violence more than others; that Humboldt County wealthy landowners did not get their land legally, they stole it, taking over large areas were Native peoples were forced out often through massacres or enslavement. We can wonder why Fort Humboldt isn’t categorized as a “concentration camp” when they were laboring Indians to death, starving them and
holding them against their will. We can open up our minds and hearts and realize that genocide -- it’s written on the landscape.

Picture
I teach this history because it’s important. I’m always surprised how little students and other people really know about what happened in California. We have no public memorials to the Native people who fought, bled, died and survived this horrific period of time. In school, children learn about a benign mission system, a prosperous gold rush, and a “fair” rancho system. Native children grow up hearing about what their ancestors did to survive, because we want them to know - you are from a strong, enduring people. This water runs through you, this land has built you, and you will heal your community to heal the land, heal the land to heal your community.

That’s right I said community. I have said it before - when Native people are talking about healing, preservation, protection, they aren’t just talking about building a better future for Indians, they are talking about building a better future for the earth. You live here right? Earth? When we talk about the balance, health and well-being that we pray for during our World Renewal Ceremonies we are talking about the balance, health, and well-being of everyone. We need to find tangible ways to address the issues that we ALL still carry with us from this depraved history. You know “learn from each other and benefit from our differing cultures for generations to come.” How do we do that in a way that matters? How do we benefit for generations?

It’s pretty simple - return the land. Let the Wiyot decide how to move forward. You know why. Because it’s not “giving Indian Island away” it’s “returning” it, to the rightful owners.

Let’s say that you have this beautiful house that your family has been in for generations. And one day your Dad sits you down and says: “Child, you are about to inherit our family house. FYI in order for us to gain ownership of the house, we came in the middle of the night and murdered everyone who lived here. And then it was ours. Oh, and also, the extended family and descendents of the survivors of our murder spree live just down the way. They sometimes come and say prayers outside the house.”

What do you do? Live in the murder house? It’s not YOURS. At some point you have a guy (maybe his name rhymes with Cob Carkley) who comes over and goes "I understand that you are thinking about giving your house back to the family of the people your family murdered to get your house. How about I offer you double the price and you DON'T give it back because I also want to use your house and my kids like it." #SoundsLegit  

When I offer this example to my classes students have very clear reactions to this scenario. (1) don’t steal other people’s stuff. It’s wrong. (2) if you inherit or benefit from someone who stole other people’s stuff, and you know that, you should do what you can to rectify that situation. (3) the easiest way to rectify that situation is to give the darn things back. (4) it’s that simple.
I’m trying to break it down into its simplest form but the truth is that Tuluwat is so much more than just “stolen stuff.” Oh it’s stolen, but it’s also not just about getting some “thing” back. Tuluwat is not being returned because the Wiyot “want” it, it is being returned because that is the right thing to do.  For everyone. For the entire “community.”
​

We are a part of the community too, us Natives. Have been since the beginning of the time. Will be. Always. The water runs through our veins. The land builds us. We pray for the health and well being of all things, we sing, we dance, we heal the community to heal the land, we heal the land to heal the community. All of the community. Everything. Together.
5 Comments

The San Diego Mission and Kumeyaay Revolt: A (decolonized) mission report written by my nine year old daughter or don't try to tell me that fourth graders can't understand a more complex view of history

6/13/2017

4 Comments

 
See every year in California Fourth Graders (and their wary parents) are forced build and/or do some kind of California Mission Project. This is a part of the California class curriculum. In third grade you learn about the "prosperous gold rush" and in the fourth grade you learn about the so-called majestic, well-built and "history changing" missions. You know, where the Catholics showed up and were all "hey Indians, we want to teach you to garden!" 

The Mission History in California is very sanitized. It erases the incredible amount of violence that it took to re-make this state into "California." The Spanish didn't just send friendly Padres they also sent scores of soldiers. Junipero Serra (the "founding father" of the mission system) wasn't just writing about how much he liked to teach Indians how to "garden" he was also writing things like: 
That the spiritual fathers should punish their sons, the Indians, by blows appears to be as old as the conquest of these kingdoms (July 7, 1780). 

If Your Lordship does not have shackles, with your permission they may be sent from here. I think that the punishment should last one month (July 31, 1775).
In both of these quotes Junipero Serra was talking about how much he felt justified in committing violence against Indian people. The first quote Serra was all "hey the Spanish were mean to Indians during conquest so we can be too." And in the second quote "Hey, I'm sending you these Indian runaways, make sure you whip them sometimes and also lock them up in shackles. If you don't have any we can send some!" 
Picture
Sure does sound like "gardening" is pretty high on that list huh? (Enforced gardening or required gardening or "unfree" gardening is also slavery FYI... historians). The narrative of the Missions as peaceful places where Friars and Native people lived together is so ubiquitous that it becomes part of the California identity. Our mission projects must show how "important" missions are to the history of California. ​

​<--- 
This is the Michaels "Mission Kit" which you can go to the store and buy and then force your children to put together a mission with these cute little Indian figures and Padre figures. But you can't buy a cat-o-nine tails (a whipping instrument that had nine ropes coming off of it that they would sometimes tie little metal balls to the end of so they could beat Native American people with it) or shackles. And no kit comes complete with the dormitories where they used to force Indian women and children to sleep at night, locked up, without a bathroom and which visiting explorers would describe as having the "foulest stench."

Here is an example of some Mission Project that I found online. Please note: I would never poke fun at these children who are obviously very sincere in their effort to complete this project. Instead, please pay attention to the types of information that they are asked to include in their mission project and the way they talk about the mission system. 
PictureFrom Facebook (Ral Christman)
I knew my daughter would face the dreaded California Mission Project once she hit the 4th grade. And that was this year. The plan was to have her do the San Diego Mission. We'd planned for her to build it, and then set it on fire and then turn that in so that she could tell the story of the Kumeyaay Revolt. Unfortunately she was not able to actually set the thing on fire, so instead she put flames on the structure and wrote her report specifically about the revolt.

​Questions that my daughter had as part of her project were things like "how did the Spanish influence the structure of the Mission?" and "Why is the mission important to California history?" She, in particular, commented to me that her friends were mostly writing "positive" things about the mission, and she really couldn't understand why. 

In my talks I often have people point out to me that teaching the "real" history of the Spanish Missions couldn't happen in the 4th grade. Children, they say, would not be able to handle "real" facts about the mission system. And I usually counter with "do you know who mostly grows up knowing this history from the very beginning of their lives? Native children. So which children are you trying to protect? There is a way to show children a more nuanced history, a history that doesn't erase Native people or make them in to passive parts of the story. I have done it with my own daughter her whole life."

But I thought what better way to show what a 4th grade project should look like when it talks about Native survivance and resilience and when it refuses to silence Native resistance then to share my daughter's report. 

I present for your reading pleasure Arya Barya's mission report. #RewriteAndRerightHistory

San Diego Mission & Kumeyaay Revolt
By: Arya (age 9)

PictureYes the San Diego Mission is on fire. B/C it's historically accurate.
In 1769 the San Diego mission was built by the Spanish. In 1775 the Kumeyaay revolted and burned the mission. The Spanish influenced this structure by deciding how it was going to be built and making it look similar to the buildings they had in Spain. After they planned it they forced the Native Americans to build it.

This mission is important to California history because it was the first mission built in California. Six years after they built the mission the Native Americans were tired of being treated badly by the priests and they set the mission on fire and led a revolt. This is important to California history because it shows that Native Americans were fighting against the mission system from the very beginning.

This has had a lot of lasting effects for Native American people. Native Americans didn’t do their cultures or traditions for a long time but now they are bringing them back. A lot of Native Americans stopped speaking their languages but now they have lots of language classes. Native Americans lost their homes and couldn't go back to their villages. The mission system tried to teach Native Americans that their culture was bad but many Native Americans today are very proud of their culture.
​
The Kumeyaay still live in San Diego today and they are proud of how they resisted the Mission system. The Kumeyaay didn’t like how they were being treated. The Spanish soldiers would hurt the Native American women. The Spanish priests would not feed the Native Americans and they were starving most of the time. The priests forced the Native Americans to work and if they didn’t work they would hit them with whips. They kidnapped the women and children from the villages and forced the men to come to the mission. A lot of Native Americans tried to run away and the soldiers would force them to come back. A lot of the Kumeyaay were mad and scared and decided to revolt against the mission system. On November 4th, 1775 the Kumeyaay set the mission on fire and tore apart the chapel. The whole mission was burned to the ground but after that the Spanish rebuilt it. (sadly) *


No, I didn't add the (sadly)... she did. Because she is awesome. 

For more info on the movement to change the 4th Grade California Mission Project:

Repeal, Replace and Reframe the 4th Grade Mission project (Sacramento State University)

With the recent adoption of the new History-Social Science Framework by the California State Board of Education, it is acknowledged that the story of California begins in pre-Columbian times. For this reason, it is important that we include the voices and history of California Indians.

To this end, the practice of creating models of the California missions and not including the impact and daily life of the native population within these missions has perpetuated a false narrative. As indicated by the State Board of Education, “building missions from sugar cubes or popsicle sticks does not help students understand the period and is offensive to many. ... Missions were sites of conflict, conquest, and forced labor.”

The intention of this resolution is to set in motion the replacement units so that educators in California, as well as those in our teacher education pipeline, can access the California Indian perspective that has been absent.

We need your support to help produce new standards-based curricula to reframe California’s history.

First, if you support this endeavor, sign on to the Resolution to Repeal, Replace and Reframe the 4th Grade Mission Project

Second, share the project with your networks:
4 Comments

I wrote about the first two seasons of Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt and then forgot to write about the third one

6/1/2017

0 Comments

 
Maybe I’m too busy. Maybe it was because I watched basically the entire season of Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt in the middle of grading final exams and cannot be responsible for anything I did during that time as my brain is still not exactly back to full capacity. Or maybe it was because Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt finally did what I suppose it wanted to do, it kind of made me go “wait, Jacqueline is Native? There’s a sort of Native (character) on a show?”
​
Not for nothing but if Titus Andromedon wasn’t a consistent part of this show then really the entire season would have boiled down to “huh? Does Kimmy ever actually row in a competition? Is she any good? Does she win? Did I miss that episode?”
I was waiting with bated breath for any mention of taking down the Washington Re*skins and when the episode finally came where Jacqueline was headed to the owners meeting for her big showdown I wanted to root for her. Sure, she’s a white actress playing a Native character who passes for white and sometimes pretends she is white and sometimes tries to reconnect to her Nativeness only to be wholly rejected by her parents, but I’m willing to go with it. Just like I’m willing to go with Kimmy being some kind of rowing wunderkind who never actually ROWS in anything. I’m willing to go with Kimmy getting into Columbia and not actually, oh I don’t know, getting a tutor, or taking advantage of her sheer luck when there are so many other people who, you know, didn’t get into Columbia or have no chance of getting into Columbia (on a freaking scholarship) so why not put in some extra hours?
​
I wrote only two sentences in my rigorous note taking that I often do when I’m trying to watch these shows and offer some kind of response: 
  1. Why do Jacqueline's  parents hate her?
  2. Have they ever met their grandchildren?
Picture
​That’s it. That’s all I wrote for the few episodes where Jacqueline was finally going to take down the Washington Racial Slur Team. And then just as soon as this storyline about Jacquelyn reclaiming her Lakota roots started it was over. She solved it. With capitalism. And something else happened later with her new boyfriend/kind of husband where he become beautiful and then he went back to his family to run the evil empire which is fine because now they changed the name.
​
Look, Jacqueline character is “interesting” in so much as she represents a Native person who must deal with complex ideas of identity and representation. When the writers, or the show runners made a decision to go all in with Jacqueline as a Sioux person, they inherited this conversation whether they knew about it or not.

​As Native people we express, understand and debate our identities because of legacies of colonialism (like blood quantum or boarding schools); because we are still defending and reclaiming our sovereignties and self-determination and because there isn’t a universal answer to how a Native character would feel, act, look or fit into a “quirky” sitcom like Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. 
Picture
Titus’s blackness is not the only defining thing about his character but it is something present (ever present). Kimmy, her whiteness is as much a part of her character as her naivete. But Jacqueline occupies this incredibly complex and layered space as a Native character who presents as an upper east side white woman who feels Lakota who craves her Nativeness in a way, but also does not make any real connection to it unless you count watching a football game with her parents wearing Washington (New Names) gear. There has to be something more for her character than “I solved this decades long problem that Native people have been fighting for and have faced threats and derogatory slurs because… I could. What were you all doing for so long protesting outside the building when you just should have found your way in?” 

I’m not looking to Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt to be the best little sitcom with a non-Native actress playing a Native person who passes as a white person who wants to connect with her Nativeness. I’m just saying couldn’t we push it? What if we went from the “oh yeah,
Jacqueline’s Native” to “F-yeah, Jacqueline is Native!”  
​
Master of None (another Netflix series) did this fantastic episode this season which (spoiler alert if you haven’t binged watched it yet, WHY NOT? GO TO THERE. Now. I’ll wait.) followed for an entire episode characters that were not part of the main cast. One right after the other the audience was able to see into the lives of other New Yorkers. It was fantastically done, thoughtful, and basically solidified for me that you can do anything now if you’re on Netflix so you have no excuse. 

Here is my proposal for you Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt writers:

Next season give us an episode. Just one. In my mind, Jacquelyn realizes that her kid has never met his grandparents and that he knows NOTHING about his Lakota heritage. She insists on taking him back to her family home where she meets up with her cousin Irene (played by Irene Bedard of course) who is the Tribal Attorney and basically the most badass awesome Native lady you’ve ever met. Jacqueline and her have always had a bit of a rivalry with each other and now Irene is like the perfect Native in Jacqueline’s mind. Any “Native” thing Jacquelyn tries to do, Irene does it better (and she has tons of inside jokes with Jacqueline's parents). At some point Jacqueline leaves in a huff convinced that she can go out and find the herb that her Mom was talking about needing. She gets lost. Eats some crazy berries. Trips out and finally gets found by Irene where they both fall in the river and get all cold. Irene can’t start the fire and Jacqueline is finally able to do it on her own. They have to hug it out into the cold night until the next day when they are found all snuggled up and sleeping. Turns out they were only like just around the corner from the hotel. Later Jacqueline dad asks Irene “why didn’t you just use the lighter you always carry in your boot?” And Irene just winks at him. *End Episode*
 And now back to House of Cards, which BTW my review so far is: I never thought I'd say this but I kinda miss those corrupt Native American casino owners. At least they were making jokes about Andrew Jackson.
0 Comments

Part III: I never thought I'd have to become a frigging Andrew Jackson scholar or that I would find myself googling "Did Andrew Jackson have tiny hands?" but here we are

2/1/2017

1 Comment

 
So zombie Andrew Jackson (AKA Donald Trump, AKA our new President, AKA AAAAAAHHHHH) decided to hang up a portrait of Andrew Jackson in the Oval Office. 
 
NO I'M SERIOUS. From thehill.com: 
President Trump hung a portrait of Andrew Jackson in the Oval Office on Tuesday, The New York Times reports, an apparent nod to the populist sentiments of the new administration.
​
Trump has also expressed admiration for the seventh president, as well, calling Jackson “an amazing figure in American history — very unique so many ways,” through a spokesperson last week.
PictureThanks to my friend Ozzie for the pic!
So this is what it feels like to finally realize you are not preparing to fight a person, but instead must go in ready to fight the undead. This is that moment that someone looks up and is like "oh, right, you're the zombie ice king, you're real, you're about to send a bunch of skeletons at me. This is why I wasn't supposed to go beyond the wall." 
                           
And then you immediately head to the library and find the card in the card catalog that says "defeating white walkers" and it's all "F'IN DRAGON GLASS YOU DUMMIES. WE TOLD YOU WINTER WAS COMING." 
 
That's how I feel right at this moment. Like I'm in the library staring at some old book which, as I read it, the music swells and I start scribbling on a pad of paper "He IS Andrew Jackson." 

Picture
​​Look, at this point, it just wouldn't surprise me. You know what WOULD surprise me, finding out that Trump is actually just a remote control robot that is being operated by the same Illuminati group that operates Glenn Beck. That would surprise me. It wouldn't FLOOR me at this point, but I'd be like "wow." 
 
But if tomorrow Trump got up on stage, proceeded to take off his wig and wipe the make up off his face and revealed that yes, he is in fact ZOMBIE ANDREW JACKSON and he's NEVER LEAVING I would look over to my Husband and say "CALLED IT!" 
 
Yet, my more analytical side usually wins over. What are the real odds that he's an illuminati, stem-cell drinking Death-Becomes-Her (ooooo young people,  you will not get that reference. Watch this) immortal? (45.5% THAT'S MY ODDS)
 
So here I am researching Andrew Jackson in the hopes of passing along information so that everyone can understand why it matters that Trump chose Mr. Trail of Tears/ Kill Indians/ F the Supreme Court/ I am the King of the World to hang in his office, glaring at him with a look that says DO YOU LIKE MY HAIR? I KNOW YOU WANT TO TOUCH IT.  
 
This has obviously become part of a series FYI so if you want to catch up read: 

Part 1: In Which we discuss the two Presidential candidates or history is as history does

Part II: ​Andrew Jackson (AKA Donald Trump) is President once again… now what? or I can’t guarantee that this blog entry won’t just devolve into a bunch of angry face emojis

And now Part III: Revenge of the Sith (no I'm kidding, kind of).

​Part III: I never thought I'd have to become a frigging Andrew Jackson scholar or that I would find myself googling "Did Andrew Jackson have tiny hands?" but here we are

PictureActual flyer made to point out that Jackson acted more like a King than a President.
​I'm trying to figure out what happens next. If Trump is point blank trying to tell us that yes, he does align himself with Andrew Jackson, then what does that mean? What happens next? 
 
In Part I I told you that means he will follow through with what he said he was going to do. Jackson was clear about what he was going to do (kill Indians) and then he did it (Trail of Tears) even though the Supreme Court told him not to. Also he was going to spend time finding new ways to consolidate power to the President (did that too).
 
In Part II I told you that it means Trump was going to act more like a king than a President, and then he would only hire people that would agree with him, and yes he was damn serious about rounding people up and kicking them out of the country. 
 
Now that Trump has checked all of those things off the list in the FIRST TWO WEEKS. What happens now? What next? 

Andrew Jackson was totes into Russia ​
​On December 8, 1829 Jackson gave a speech to Congress where he said:
​In Russia, placed by her territorial limits, extensive population, and great power high in the rank of nations, the United States have always found a steadfast friend. Although her recent invasion of Turkey awakened a lively sympathy for those who were exposed to the desolation of war, we can not but anticipate that the result will prove favorable to the cause of civilization and to the progress of human happiness. The treaty of peace between these powers having been ratified, we can not be insensible to the great benefit to be derived by the commerce of the United States from unlocking the navigation of the Black Sea, a free passage into which is secured to all merchant vessels bound to ports of Russia under a flag at peace with the Porte. 
​Translation: Okay yeah, they are invading countries and sure some people might have sympathy for those invaded people but really Russia has stuff that we might want (like oil) and we could probably get more things if we just ignore all the other stuff (like war crimes) so...

Kind of like how Jackson 2.0 (Trump) is considering a "reset" with Russia so that we can get at all of Russia's stuff.
The real question people have to start asking themselves is not who is in the cabinet but who is in the "Kitchen Cabinet?"
PictureThis image is the top of a cigar box that shows Peggy meeting Andrew Jackson and then two dudes fighting over her.
​Andrew Jackson had his official cabinet of folks who were supposedly advising and helping him run things. However, at a point they all started fighting with each other because they were a group of petty people who seemed to be more concerned with their rivalries and gaining influence over Andrew Jackson than with actually running the country. 
                
Sound familiar? (We see you Jared Kushner and Kelly Anne blonde lady.)
 
During Jackson's term this resulted in the "Petticoat affair" which when I tell you about it you are going to be like "OH MY GAWD PLEASE STOP BEING IN HIGH SCHOOL." 

You will also realize that people in the 1800s were not at all above some Real Housewives level shenanigans. 

In this episode of the Real Housewives of the 1800s we have Floride Calhoun (no I'm serious, no really) who was the wife of the Vice-President John Calhoun. And she was like "Oh my gawd, Peggy Eaton is so basic." And Peggy Eaton's husband, John Eaton, who was the Secretary of War, was like "STOP BEING SO MEAN TO MY WIFE YOU GUYZZZZ." And then Floride Calhoun (best name for a Real Housewife EVER) was all "Let's be mean to Peggy Eaton and make it so nobody ever hangs out with her because I think that she talks a lot and she's not a proper lady and I think that John Eaton liked her even when she was married...SCANDAL." And then John Eaton was like "I HATE YOU GUYS SOOOO MUCH." 

PictureDang Floride, you harsh.
No seriously, consider that there was an "anti-Peggy coalition" in Washington because of course there was. 
 
Anyway, Jackson's niece (who was also serving as his First Lady because he was a widower) she was like "Oh my goodness Floride you are so right. Peggy is the worst, she is so not fetch." And Floride was all... wait for it... "STOP TRYING TO MAKE FETCH HAPPEN Andrew Jackson's niece." 
 
The only person in the cabinet who sided with the Eatons was Martin Van Buren, and this made Andrew Jackson happy. At a point Jackson looked around and went "this some bullshit" and when Martin Van Buren offered to resign, Jackson took that as a chance to make all of his cabinet resign. 
 
Why do we have to know this story? Because it's some bullshit, but also because what ended up really happening was that Andrew Jackson's cabinet was so cray they basically stopped having any meetings. So while people thought they knew who the cabinet was Jackson was actually getting most of his advice and guidance from an unofficial group of friends. Some of the press started calling it Jackson's "Kitchen Cabinet." 
 
One of the key members -- Francis Preston Blair who GET THIS was an editor and journalist who ran a news organization that chiefly served as a propaganda instrument from Jackson's party. That's right, he relied mainly on a guy who used to write fake news for a living. SOUND FAMILIAR (I used to think it was Steve Bannon but it's Alex Jones you guys. THIS GUY. THIS DUDE RIGHT HERE.)
 
Pay attention - look for the "Kitchen Cabinet." Everybody else is just fighting with each other about who is more basic (you all are. You are all the most basic).

Andrew Jackson made a plan to use the U.S. military to invade states that were saying laws and policies are unconstitutional
Take a knee and consider this. I'm not going to argue that South Carolina was right. I'm not going to argue that Andrew Jackson was wrong (I don't need to, because he's always wrong, ALWAYS). I'm not even going to argue the merits of imposing tariffs on foreign goods or whether or not it actually did come down to slavery (it did). I'm just going to present the following: 

In 1833 Andrew Jackson went to Congress and pressed them to pass the "Force Bill." This bill would authorize Jackson to use the army to force South Carolina to abide by tariffs that were being imposed on foreign made goods. At the time, the "Tariff of Abominations" (as so named by the southern States) meant that there was a 62% tax on 92% of all imported goods. According to South Carolina this was mostly to benefit the North, where they relied on manufacturing for jobs and money and it punished the South, who had to pay out the wazoo for their goods.  South Carolina turns around and goes "THIS CRAP IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL dummy" and they pass their own law that says they don't got to abide by no tariff no more.

Andrew Jackson was pissed. Surprisingly so. Many people expected him not to be pissed, and in fact the more you learn about him the more you'd think he'd be like "damn, they told you Federal Government!" However, he was pissed. So much so that he went to Congress and basically said "you have to let me have the power to send in the Feds! They don't get to declare sanctuary cities and spaces! This is about the union!" 

And Congress did. 

Congress passed the Force Bill which said that Andrew Jackson could invade a state because they were refusing to abide by what they thought was an unconstitutional and illegal law. 

That's just something people should know. When our current President threatens to withhold Federal funding from states that are declaring sanctuary cities for immmigrants; when he tells Chicago he's going to "send in the feds" we have to believe that he means it. Keep your eye on the prize, which is the power to do what he wants. 

In the end he did not get to invade South Carolina because Congress made a last minute deal so that South Carolina would abide by the tariffs. And according to some historians, Jackson had been on the edge of his seat ready to go in, he wanted to attack -- he wanted to attack U.S. citizens.
Did Andrew Jackson have tiny hands?
Was he also, in fact, a "short fingered vulgarian?" Evidence has not swayed me one way or the other (he wore a lot of gloves, they could have been stuffed gloves). I have a feeling if I asked Jackson he'd go "what? no? who cares? I have a big cane. A huge cane. A tremendous cane. Just huge. That's all that matters." 
 
It's always really about the size of their cane. 
Now what? 
​The other day I was texting with my friend and I wrote "If I disappear Zombie Andrew Jackson has taken me." I then said "That's going to be the first line of my book of essays." 
 
Sometimes I convince myself I'm getting a little too close to the truth. Maybe he's not reanimated Andrew Jackson, maybe he's just worshipping at the altar of Jackson and talking to Jackson's portrait in his office promising that he will "finish what you started!"
 
Like this: 
​But what it really means is that our continuing colonial narrative of American exceptionalism and whitewashing history to make President's more palatable, that really matters. It constantly comes back to bite us, doesn't it? 
 
Sometimes I'll get students in class and they'll say "we can't teach about American Presidents as some of the worst people? We can't just teach all this bad stuff. We can learn all that stuff later. But when we are growing we have to teach us about the positives so that we don't have nightmares." 
 
But really, it's so we don't have to own up to ongoing settler colonialism. We act like all of these things couldn't happen so that they continue to happen. It becomes hard for us to imagine a world where our President would actually round people up and kill them all, illegally, even though the Supreme Court told them not to - but it already happened. It is hard for us to imagine that our President would make a plan to invade one of our states and not make efforts to avoid having to go to war with their own people - but it already happened. We can barely imagine that one of our President's would be beholden to propaganda news and get his facts and information from a propaganda news site and not from informed people in government positions - but it already happened. 
 
So when it's happening to us, we still don't want to believe it. We want to think we can reason with ourselves, that maybe we are seeing things that are not there. It's such a shock. It should not be a shock.

Andrew Jackson was an asshole; we should call him that.
 
We can and should be critical of our past leaders so that we can learn how to be critical and responsive to our current leaders. They can shout at us all they want that this is for "the union" or "the people" but it is up to us to shout right back "we are the people." 
 
We are the narrative. 
We are the story. 
We are the voices that will set the tone for our next generations. 
The ones who will tear down the wall. 
The ones who will stand up for equality. 
The ones who will march together. 
The ones who will proclaim at the top of their lungs "Andrew Jackson was an asshole. And he will never be allowed in the Oval Office again."
1 Comment
<<Previous

    Subscribe

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


    Click to
    Email Me

    Sometimes Writer-Blogger Cutcha Risling Baldy

    Promote Your Page Too

    Author

    Cutcha Risling Baldy is an Associate Professor and Department Chair of Native American Studies at Humboldt State University. She received her PhD in Native American Studies from the University of California, Davis.  She is also a writer, mother, volunteer Executive Director for the Native Women's Collective and is currently re-watching My Name is Earl...


    (5) Top Posts

    On telling Native people to just "get over it" or why I teach about the Walking Dead in my Native Studies classes... *Spoiler Alert!*
    Hokay -- In which I lead a presentation on what happens when you Google "Native American Women" and critically analyze the images or "Hupas be like dang where'd you get that dentalium cape girl? Showing off all your money! PS: Suck it Victorias Secret"
    In which we establish that there was a genocide against Native Americans, yes there was, it was genocide, yes or this is why I teach Native Studies part 3 million
    5 Reasons I Wear "Indian" Jewelry or Hupas...we been bling-blingin' since Year 1
    Pope Francis decides to make Father Junipero Serra a saint or In Which I Tell Pope Francis he needs to take a Native Studies class like stat

    I need to read more Native blogs!

    A few that I read...
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    June 2020
    December 2019
    September 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    December 2011
    July 2011
    May 2011


    RSS Feed

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Categories

    All
    1491s
    562 Project
    Act For The Government And Protection Of Indians
    Adam Beach
    Adrienne Keene
    American Indians In Children's Literature
    American Indian Stereotypes
    And Old Episodes Of Ally Mcbeal
    Armie Hammer
    Balas Chonas
    Beyonce
    Book Reviews
    Bundy Militia
    California Missions
    Catholic Church
    Columbus
    Cultural Appropriation
    Debbie Reese
    Deborah Miranda
    Disney
    Federal Indian Law
    Flower Dance
    Genocide
    Gold Rush
    Graduate Student Mantra
    Hobbits
    Hupa
    Indian Humor
    Indigenous Epistemology
    Ishi Last Of The Yahi
    Jack Forbes
    Jack Norton
    Jenna Maroney
    Jim Ruel
    JK Rowling
    Johnny Depp
    Jon Stewart
    Junipero Serra
    Kevin Bacon
    Klamath River
    Klamath Trinity Restoration Agreement
    Lone Ranger
    Magic In North America
    Matika Wilbur
    Mihesuah
    Natalie Diaz
    Native American Studies
    Native American Worldview
    Native Appropriations
    Native Cameo
    Native Representations
    NBC
    Network Television
    No Doubt
    Play
    Pope Francis
    Reflective Posting
    Representation
    Review
    Sacramento State
    Save Our River
    Scalia
    Settler Colonialism
    #SettlerNonsense
    Simon Moya-Smith
    Supreme Court
    Television
    That's Right CHRIS ROCK
    Theatre Dance And Performance
    The Daily Show
    Tiffany Midge
    Tina Fey
    Tonto
    Tonto Syndrome
    Uc Berkeley
    Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
    Vine Deloria Jr
    Winnemem Wintu
    Women
    Zambo Dende

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.